Network Attached Storage, or NAS, devices are very handy for a variety of reasons. Beyond just acting as shared file storage for multiple users locally, most can be configured to provide that access to you while on-the-go. Additionally, hosting some form of media server, storing images, mirroring to another unit, and more are all other reasons to get one.
Many also natively support Apple's Time Machine backup tool for Macs. Using, if a file is ever deleted, you can browse back through different states of your computer through time to recover the file, or even grab a previous version. If a Mac starts acting up, you can completely restore from any point in the past as well. Apple's Time Capsule was a great option as both a destination for Time Machine backups and as a wireless router. Now that, many are on the market for a new NAS device, so we rounded up the best consumer-grade options for anyone with a Mac or iOS device.
There are a variety of My Cloud variants out there, but the most basic and widely appealing option is the model. Time Machine support is included as well as media streaming with DLNA, remote file access, and even an iTunes server. We particularly liked the ability to right-click a folder on our Mac and choose sync to copy all the files to the My Cloud. Mobile apps for iOS and Android make it easy to access on the go, though they aren't the best-designed ones out there.
There is also a web interface available if you don't happen to have one of your devices around. Using the USB port on the back, you can attach USB flash drives or hard drives to import files easily.
Aside from the My Cloud Home, My Cloud Home Duo ups the storage capacity up to 16TB in total. If you need additional RAID options, the My Cloud Expert or My Cloud Pro models are a better bet. You can pick up the basic My Cloud Home 2TB model on or at for $139.00. B&H will not collect sales tax on orders shipped outside New York and New Jersey (Colorado and Vermont residents, ). Seagate Personal Cloud. Alongside Western Digital, Seagate is another common brand when it comes to storage solutions.
Is an excellent NAS device with 4 TB of storage. It has a modern design, with a sleek black body and a horizontal layout, compared to the vertical orientation of the My Cloud. Family and friends can be invited to join with secure file sharing through private emails.
It also supports Time Machine, with it working as a local drive when connected through USB or across the network with Ethernet. Using the Seagate Media app, files can be accessed remotely on an iOS or Android device. Alternatively, media can be streamed to a variety of devices, including Apple TV, Chromecast, and Roku. Many TVs from LG and Samsung also work via DLNA.
Not to mention Playstation and Xbox. The Seagate Personal Cloud with 4TB of storage can be found on Amazon. Promise Apollo Cloud 2. The has one of the easiest setups around, all of which can be done from your iPhone. As a bonus, the device supports Apple's Files app on the iPhone and iPad directly, allowing for easy file migration to and from your mobile device. Connectivity wise, this NAS device has a USB 3.0 port for backups and file transfers, and an Ethernet port for connecting to the router. The unit is powered by a dual-core processor and dual 4TB 'surveillance-class' drives which can be configured as RAID 0 or 1.
Free Autodesk 3ds Max 2009 Download
We took a look at it, and found it to be a great 'set and forget' device with Time Machine compatibility, but lacking niceties found in other devices like media library streaming. The Promise Apollo Cloud 2 is available on and for $379.00. Synology Diskstation DS218j. Is known for their high-end network storage solutions. The DS218j is an upgraded version of their popular DS216 model from a couple years ago. Unlike some of the others, the DS218j is sold diskless, and it is up to you insert your own pair of drives. Those drives can be set up in Synology Hybrid RAID, Basic, JBOD, RAID 0, and RAID 1 configurations.
Synology offers myriad applications to add capabilities to the unit. Apps like DS File, DS Photo, DS Video, DS Cloud, and others really offer a ton of features for the Diskstation.
Like the others, it supports Time Machine, but so much more. To connect, there is an Ethernet port along the back, with three USB ports available for one-time transfers or expanding the unit with external drives. Given the app-centric nature of the device, streaming options are effectively endless with the Diskstation. After software expansion, the device is able to send audio and video to Samsung TVs, Roku players, Apple TV, Google Chromecast, DLNA devices, and more. You can find the Synology DS218j Diskstation on or for $169.99.
TerraMaster F2-220. Makes some great devices, and the aptly named F2-220 is no different.
It has an aluminum alloy body with easily swappable drives. Like others, it comes empty, relying on the user to install any set of drives they'd like. This device also has an Intel Celeron 2.41GHz dual-core CPU and 2GB of RAM inside to help power it, which is great if you have many users or using it as a streaming media server. There is also support out-of-the-box for Time Machine, plus a wide array of apps including a file server, mail server, web server, media server, Rsync remote server, FTP server, MySQL server and others It also supports DLNA streaming, and can act as an iTunes media server. The TerraMaster F2-220, without drives, can be found on and for $199.99. Buffalo TeraStation 1200D. Makes one of the best looking NAS devices on our list, fitting well within any home or office.
It has two internal drive bays, with configurations ranging from 2TB to 8TB of storage. Time Machine is supported, as well as multiple user access with remote support.
It is DLNA-certified in addition to iTunes support for media server duties, although reviews suggest it may not be as robust from a file format support standpoint as some of the others. The Buffalo TeraStation 1200D starts at $227.99 at both and. Happens to be the most expensive on the list, running nearly $500 without the drives. It is, however, one of the most lauded NAS devices out there, perfect for offices as well as personal use. This is capable of handling up to 64TB of storage when the drives are installed - which is a fairly easy task. It has enough internal slots for five 3.5-inch drives. One of the best features is the internal battery.
Should power ever fail, the internal battery will keep your data safe until you can get it going again. Dual Ethernet ports also make it easy to connect.
One can connect to the router, the other to your Mac or the rest of the network, possibly offering increased performance, depending on network architecture. Beyond file sharing, and Time Machine support, a variety of apps are available that work with Drobo, similar to the Synology NAS. Some allow the setup of a Plex media server, others enable remote access or cloud backup, and one is even available to automatically and securely backup all photos from your iOS device. You can find the Drobo 5N2 on or for $499.99.
Crack 3ds Max 2016
A deep rabbit hole Some of these devices are extremely easy to set up, like the Promise Apollo Cloud 2. Others need a bit more configuration and maintenance. It's also very easy for a network attached storage project to get very expensive, very fast. Our list is just of the ones we've used and like, with a limitation we've applied on initial setup ease and a reasonable budget. Many of them have super in-depth options, with large app stores hosting services that can be added that we've only alluded to.
Many more can take a pile of drives for truly epic amounts of storage and a similarly profound cost - but for this, we've eliminated those as well. Take a look at the tech specs of each unit before you buy. And, don't be caught without a backup We've said it before, and we'll say it again: backups are key.
While a single NAS in your own home isn't the only source of backup you should rely on, it is a crucial start to a good backup regimen. Instead of relying on yourself to consistently connect a wired hard drive and manually backup, a NAS can offer convenience and automation, as well as a variety of other features. You can extend this with off-site backup options, which is basically installing a compatible NAS in another location such as a trusted friend's house, and automatically syncing the two - but this is a topic for another day. Be sure to check out for alternatives to Apple's discontinued AirPort routers. How many, if any, of these support file metadata? In particular Finder tags and custom folder icons.
The latter may not matter but if you use Finder tags to keep project stuff together, their loss can leave you with major problems. I know Synology don’t support them and outside an HFS+ or APFS formatted drive, I doubt anything else does. I'm not certain that any do, anymore, as regardless of drive support, I think that the data is stripped out during a SMB transfer from them.
I'll delve over the weekend. Edited May 10. Actually forget TimeMachine on WD drives that fail with click of parking heads. Seagate Backup Plus beats all of them for TimeMachine (running business on them).
Not a NAS however. As far as NAS (WiFi or Ethernet attached), Synology NAS with Hitachi UltraStar (HGST) is specialized for servers and outlast many WD drive based configurations due to MTBF and optimization on parking heads.Synology has outstanding reliability and updates. No issues for many years. Going SSD is still expensive. Synology is for specialized file storage servers - it is Linux based file system so please do not bring to discussion if it supports HFS or APFS - it is not for that as it is different OS that manges storage. You can format USB attached Seagate Backup Plus for that (and TimeMachine), but it is not NAS. Synology has many apps including media connectivity (It is DNLA as article says).
You can use all popular apps to get your music and movies from Synology. It has also IP cameras connectivity and app for survailence and recording. It is really a Linux computer that you can manage via browser access.
Outstanding quality. Edited May 10. QNAP TS-251+ would the equivalent of the synology listed here. In some ways works better. I went with a QNAP. There's a crazy amount of features. Ruchira recipe book in marathi pdf. I'm not sure if this is the correct word, but I wish it was more us er friendly as its not something I'd recommend to those that aren't tech savvy or willing to put some effort into learning how to use the UI or properly securing the device.
Even now I still can't figure out how to get rid of certain folders or keep an AFP drive from appearing alongside the TM drive, even through they're the same thing. They do seem to have frequent firmware updates, which I appreciate. I had to face a ransomware attack a couple of years ago: both the file server and the backup unit, which was a standard NAS, were completely defeated – no hope to retrieve anything from either unit. The Syneto unit that was sitting on the same network got under fire too - but only the last snapshot was accessible via the network, so it was the only one that got corrupted. I've successfully restored the previous snapshot in less than 15 minutes (I keep 24 daily snapshots on this machine) and got everything back. It was really a life saver.
QNAP TS-251+ would the equivalent of the synology listed here. In some ways works better.
I'm not sure if this is the correct word, but I wish it was more us er friendly as its not something I'd recommend to those that aren't tech savvy or willing to put some effort into learning how to use the UI or properly securing the device. Having done some research I went Synology (218 Play) rather than QNAP because the consensus appeared to be that although the hardware wasn’t as powerful, the apps were more ‘polished’ and easier for a first timer to use. I’m still learning what it can do! Edited May 10. QNAP TS-251+ would the equivalent of the synology listed here.
In some ways works better. I'm not sure if this is the correct word, but I wish it was more us er friendly as its not something I'd recommend to those that aren't tech savvy or willing to put some effort into learning how to use the UI or properly securing the device. Having done some research I went Synology (218 Play) rather than QNAP because the consensus appeared to be that although the hardware wasn’t as powerful, the apps were more ‘polished’ and easier for a first timer to use. I’m still learning what it can do! Yeah, I went with it for its low cost at the time, and it's been great, but I also only use it for Time Machine backups. I gave Plex a try but didn't care for it (but I also didn't care for it on my Mac mini server, which I felt was much nicer and inarguably faster). It has an iTunes Server and countless other options, which I've never tried.
I think it took me a few months before I found out how to enable SSL for their local web portal, which is pretty pathetic on my part. PS: If this NAS breaks I probably won't go with another NAS, but instead just get a TB3 drive for the RAID connected to my Mac mini and use the older RAID for my TM backups, unless there are some major breakthroughs in what a NAS can offer. Even though my RAID is using USB 3.0/USB-A and my Mac mini is connected to my AirPort Extreme via GigE which is connected to my NAS via GigE it's still much slower than I'd like when having to do a full backup after upgrading to larger drives. Edited May 10. Actually forget TimeMachine on WD drives that fail with click of parking heads.
Seagate Backup Plus beats all of them for TimeMachine (running business on them). Not a NAS however. As far as NAS (WiFi or Ethernet attached), Synology NAS with Hitachi UltraStar (HGST) is specialized for servers and outlast many WD drive based configurations due to MTBF and optimization on parking heads.Synology has outstanding reliability and updates. No issues for many years.
Going SSD is still expensive. I agree that Synology NAS has outstanding quality; I've had two over the past 6 years, and my only complaint was the really slow CPU in my initial 211j. My current DiskStation, a 214play, handles multiple services, including Plex Server and Time Machine backups, like a champ.
To clarify on the WD drives, however, the issues you list are primarily a problem with the Green line (and maybe Blue). The Red line is designed for NAS applications: they're quiet, (relatively) cool, and don't park. I've used the same pair of 2TB WD Red drives almost continuously since I bought them nearly 6 years ago, and they're still plugging along. Edited May 10. None of the mentioned NAS is also a router/wireless-router as an Airport Time Capsule (ATC) does. Most of the NAS processors are too slow for Time Machine sparse files structure.
ATC, being a router/wireless router, provide internal storage (2TB/3TB) giving SATA read-write speed of reliability to the Time Machine backup sparse files. NAS mentioned can’t do that. None of them can. Sooner or later, NAS users will hit the verification error and TM backup will be scrapped and needs to be rebuilt. Conclusion: don’t use NAS to do TM backup.
Use USB external drive, if ATC is no more available, or USB-C/Thunderbolt-x external drives are not affordable.
Okay, I just installed Windows 7 64-bit. I am trying to activate 3ds Max 2009.
Using the auto tool within Max always causes it to return: 'Unable to write the new serial number into the Windows Registry for this machine. This prevents reactivation. Administrative priviledges may be required for this operation.' So I manually go online to autodesk to register it to get a key. It spits out a key for me. I happily try to paste it in and it bonks at it with either the above message or please contact autodesk.
3ds Max 2009 Crack Torrent
Tried this 3 times manually with different codes. It refuses to write to the registry. What do I need to do to tell Windows 7 that I am the only person in a 0000 mile radius even using the machine.
I bought the machine. I installed the OS on it. I bought the applications running on it. I pay for the electricity to power it. I pay for the internet access. But I am not allowed to write to my own registry? I swear Windows XP never gave me this many headaches.
What do I need to do to get to a state in which I am allowed to register my own software on my own machine? :) I like your argument. I wish computers understand these simple logic. With windows 7 UAC controls bit more that XP hence it is not that simple. Sorry:( officially 3ds max 2010 or above should work on windows 7. 2009 was not tested to work on windows 7 as it was released before windows 7 was launched.
To try few things on windows 7 (if that's the only way forward for you; these are some suggestions only we have not tested these) -Try to disable UAC -Try to start in Diagnostics mode, login as true administrator usa. Autodesk.com/getdoc/id=TS1054234 -Try to run the program in Windows XP compatibilty model hope this helps.